#Gpg suite export kleopatra how to
#Gpg suite export kleopatra password
#Gpg suite export kleopatra mac

The main differences are that a PGP key can only be used with PGP programs and not S/MIME, while the S/MIME format keys can only be used with S/MIME and similar programs but not PGP, so which is better depends on who you want or need to communicate with.

#Gpg suite export kleopatra password

The private key is encrypted by password-based encryption with 3DES which is decent but at risk if and when quantum analysis succeeds, and dependent on the password in the same fashion as gpg/OpenPGP following common practice, the cert is encrypted with a weak algorithm (RC2-40) which is unnecessary and silly.

#Gpg suite export kleopatra mac

PKCS12 private keys are protected by a password-based MAC and also include the X.509 cert which is protected as above and partially verifies the private key. PKCS1 and PKCS8 private keys from gpgsm are not encrypted, which is very bad, and not protected from tampering either, but as noted Kleopatra doesn’t support these. X.509 public keys (certs) are protected from tampering by CA signature and don’t need confidentiality, like PGP public keys. However Kleopatra supports only X.509 and PKCS12. gpgsm supports exporting public keys as X.509 certificates, and private keys in PKCS1, PKCS8, or PKCS12 formats, all in binary and PEM variants. Gpgsm processes S/MIME (effectively CMS) messages using S/MIME keys and certificates, and similarly supports binary and PEM files although not identical, PEM is very similar to PGP’s ASCII armor and gpgsm adapts option -armor to actually mean PEM. Public keys are protected against tampering by at least one signature, and don’t need to be confidential private keys have one signature, and are encrypted with password-based encryption using reasonable algorithms by default (unless you have deliberately configured them badly) so their confidentiality is protected if you use a good password (including passphrase) and not otherwise. gpg is sometimes used for binary files, but sometimes people use other extensions to indicate the type of content as well as format, such as.

asc for armored files, because the actual content type can be determined by looking at the first (or last) line. There is one OpenPGP-defined format for each of public and private keys, and those are the (only) export formats gpg supports, in both variants. Gpg processes OpenPGP messages using OpenPGP keys, and for all files (except clearsigned) it supports binary or ‘ASCII armored’ variants. People often (usually?) choose the extension to reflect the format, and some programs (like the GUI Kleopatra in gpg4win) encourage this, but GnuPG itself can process a file depending on its actual format without regard to the extension (or lack thereof). Nor if you mean the GnuPG suite (which includes both gpg and gpgsm) or the gpg program only.įirst, to clarify, the extension on a filename doesn’t really matter what is important is the format of the data in the file(s). You appear to be asking about keys exported from GnuPG, although you don’t actually say so, and it isn’t clear if you mean public keys (only) or secret (aka private) keys. We have many solutions to this problem, But we recommend you to use the first method because it is tested & true method that will 100% work for you. I know you bored from this bug, So we are here to help you! Take a deep breath and look at the explanation of your problem.

#Gpg suite export kleopatra how to

Which one is the most recommended ? and why ? How to solve :

So please tell me their differences (GPG, Ascii, p12) ? gpg extension is in binary, and Ascii is in text.īut I want to know their differences regarding its quality and security. I read in some docs, there are several version of GPG key extension available. All we need is an easy explanation of the problem, so here it is.